Quran Errors in Transmission
Many Muslims believe the Quran is without error and exists exactly as Muhammad recited:
The original texts of most of the former divine Books were lost altogether, and only their translations exist today. The Qur’an, on the other hand, exists exactly as it had been revealed to the Prophet; not a word – nay, not a dot of it – has been changed. It is available in its original text and the Word of God has been preserved for all times to come. (Abul A’la Maududi, Towards Understanding Islam, [Gary: IN, 1970], 109)
The orientalist A.J. Arberry in the foreword to his translation of the meaning of the Quran wrote:
Apart from certain orthographical modifications of the originally somewhat primitive method of writing, intended to render unambiguous and easy the task of reading and recitation, the Koran as printed in the twentieth century is identical with the Koran as authorized by ‘Uthmān more than 1,300 years ago. (ix)
The following list of Quran errors is to demonstrate that such beliefs are not true. My goal is to help Muslims understand that the Quran has a history of transmission errors, and that they should not dismiss the Bible because of its textual history.
The first complete Arabic Quran in moveable type
The first known complete Arabic Quran, printed by movable type, appeared in Venice in 1537-8. A very faulty Quranic text was found in the 1980s.1Michael W. Albin, “Printing of the Qur’an.” Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. General Editor: Jane Dammen McAuliffe (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005), CD-ROM version.
Perhaps the most important—and most elusive—printed book in Arabic is the edition of the Koran produced by the Venetian printer Paganino de’ Paganini in 1537-38. All copies were thought to have perished in a fire until one remaining example was discovered in the 1980s in the library of the Frati Minori di San Michele ad Isola in Venice. The edition was probably intended as a commercial venture, but its odd typeface was quite unacceptable by Muslim calligraphic norms, and the numerous errors in the Koranic text were even more objectionable to Muslim sensibilities. As a commercial—or even an evangelical—venture, it was not a success (Jonathan Bloom, Paper before Print: The History and Impact of Paper on the Islamic World, [New Haven 2001], 220).
Qurans printed in India and Pakistan
Printers in India and Pakistan admit to printing errors:
The Qurʾāns of India and Pakistan are characteristically individual in appearance and are often the result of personal devotions rather than the product of corporate investment or organized outreach. The Qurʾān of 1964 published in Shillong, East Pakistan embodies these idiosyncrasies. It is an Arabic text with English translation and with running commentary by Khadim Rahmani. In his introduction he says, “This being the first edition and the process of printing being a difficult one, we had to engage a local press for doing the job, so as to maintain a constant vigil and guidance all along the printing. Yet in spite of our best efforts, some printing mistakes cropped up.”
The same difficulties are noted in The divine Qurʾān with Arabic text, translation into English and English commentary by S.M. Abdul Hamid published in Dacca in 1962. The English translation is typewritten and comments are typed footnotes. In his introduction Abdul Hamid laments the poor quality of the paper and printing: “Some of my friends desired better printing and paper. But those who are aware of the difficulties of publishing will admit that in Pakistan [sic] we are to depend on the paper supplied by the local mills, and printing cannot be controlled unless one has got his own press.” Like Khadim Rahmani, Abdul Hamid calls on his readers to alert him to printing mistakes. Even the prestigious edition with English translation of Abdullah Yusuf Ali published serially in Lahore beginning in 1937 bears the translator’s request for corrections. (Michael W. Albin, “Printing of the Qur’an.” Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. General Editor: Jane Dammen McAuliffe [Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005], CD-ROM version)
The Cairo Edition of the Quran
The circumstances leading to the Cairo edition of the Arabic Quran, probably the most popular printed Arabic Quran in the world today, were errors in printed Quranic texts:
the Egyptian government was motivated to begin the project that would lead to the Cairo Qur’an edition due to the variations (or “errors,” as an appendix to the Cairo edition describes them) found in the Qur’anic texts that they had been importing for state schools. In response, the government destroyed a large number of such texts by sinking them in the Nile River and issued its own text. The Cairo project thus followed in the spirit of the caliph ‘Uthman, and the governor al-Hajjaj b. Yusuf (d. 95/714), who are reported to have destroyed competing versions and distributed their own text of the Qur’an in the first Islamic century (Gabriel Said Reynolds, “Introduction,” in The Qurʾān in its Historical Context, ed. Gabriel S. Reynolds [London, Routledge, 2008], p.3).
The Sana Quran
The Sana Quran is significant because it differs from the standard Quran disseminated by Uthman.2Literary sources also indicate different text traditions from the Companions of Muhammad: Ibn Masud and Ubay ibn Ka’b; however, these rescensions are only known from descriptions in literary sources (Behnam Sadeghi; Uwe Bergmann, “The Codex of a Companion of the Prophet and the Qur’ān of the Prophet,” Arabica, Volume 57, Number 4, 2010, 344). The variants of the Sana Quran have not yet all been published but here is a list of several: 3Sadeghi, Behnam; Mohsen Goudarzi, “Ṣan’ā’ 1 and the Origins of the Qur’ān,” Der Islam (March 2012), 21. The authors of this same article say they plan a future article with a “systematic textual analysis of all the variants” (p.8).
Examples of Major Variants in the Sana Quran palimpsest (a.k.a. C-1 or the lower writing of Saṇʿāʾ 1)
(Behnam and Goudarzi, 21)
Talking point with Muslims
Many Muslims believe the Quran, as recited by Muhammad, has been perfectly preserved in perfect manuscripts. This is proof the Quran came from heaven (Quran 15:9; 85:21-22). However, the above examples demonstrate that human error is part of the textual history of the Quran.
The textual tradition of the Quran is important because it should give Muslims pause before dismissing the Bible because it also has a textual history.
- Does your Muslim friend know that there are textual variants in Arabic Quran manuscripts? The point of this question is that the existence of textual variants in the biblical tradition does not automatically disqualify the Bible from being the Word of God. Invite your Muslim friend to read the Gospels.
- Did you know that the Qur’anic Injīl is a non-existent book? Did you know this non-existent book is the main reason Muslims believe the New Testament is corrupted?
You may also be interested in:
What every Muslim should know about the Bible
What every Christian should know about the Quran
The most obvious historical inaccuracy in the Quran
References
| ↥1 | Michael W. Albin, “Printing of the Qur’an.” Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. General Editor: Jane Dammen McAuliffe (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005), CD-ROM version. |
| ↥2 | Literary sources also indicate different text traditions from the Companions of Muhammad: Ibn Masud and Ubay ibn Ka’b; however, these rescensions are only known from descriptions in literary sources (Behnam Sadeghi; Uwe Bergmann, “The Codex of a Companion of the Prophet and the Qur’ān of the Prophet,” Arabica, Volume 57, Number 4, 2010, 344). |
| ↥3 | Sadeghi, Behnam; Mohsen Goudarzi, “Ṣan’ā’ 1 and the Origins of the Qur’ān,” Der Islam (March 2012), 21. The authors of this same article say they plan a future article with a “systematic textual analysis of all the variants” (p.8). |
look errors in the quran, give me only one, i give over 100 errors in the bible. thanks.
The obvious errors that matter—the kinds of errors I mentioned in this post don’t, in my opinion, matter—is #1 The Qur’anic Injil; and #2 the Quran’s denial of Jesus’ death on the cross.
Jesus didn’t die on a cross, you and everybody else know this. Me being here is proof that Jesus didn’t die on a cross.
Name them
To take the history of the Quran in short:
1. First what Muhammad said, simply was memorized by believers.
2. Later it was written down on leaves, pieces of bones, etc., but in a very incomplete alphabet, mainly consisting of the consonants.
3. From these texts Qurans were written, but because of the incomplete alphabet, these varied a lot. There even were repeated armed strife about which variety was the correct one.
4. Because of this Caliph Uthman ca. 650 AD had an official edition made
5. Muslim sources tell that Uthman omitted some 100 verses he did not like, but added a similar number not original ones he did like.
6. He then ordered all other versions destroyed. This was not done, and the many old varieties may have influenced copy writing into he 800s.
7. But the Arab alphabet still was as incomplete as before, and “a forest” of varieties emerged.
8. Because of this, around 900 AD a group led by the very learned ibn Mohair tried to find which variety – if any – was the correct one. This they were unable to find out, and in the end 14 versions were “canonized” + 6 were named “good” + 4 were named “acceptable”. = 24 varieties of the Quran are accepted by Islam.
9. Today 6 of them are in daily use some places around the world. the 2 most used are the versions Asad after Hafs and Nafi after Warsh.
10. Still today nobody knows which one of the 24 versions – if any – is the exact words of Muhammad.
So much for the easy and cheap claim that the Quran is the exact words of Muhammad.
Then there are all the errors in the Quran. There are documented unbelievable 1750+ wrong facts, 350+ other not religious errors, 300+ internal contradictions, 1500+ wrong quotes from or references to the Bible (contrary to what Muhammad always claimed, the Bible is proved not falsified – some errors, though far from as bad as the Quran, but strongly proved not falsified – and 100+ obvious or proved lies = 4ooo+ errors or lies. NO god, and definitely no omniscient god would make 4ooo+ errors in his holy book = it is not true that the Quran is the words of a god. And if you add all the points so unclear that Islam even today is not sure what is the real meaning of – and remember that no omniscient god would be anything but christal clear in his holy book – the proofs for that it is not true that the Quran is the words of a god, = it thus proveably is made up by somebody else, likely by Muhammad = Islam is a made up superstition.
Anybody it free to check my information.
Martin A. Engeset
I would like to kindly tell you that quran words are given by god to him were he wrote them,then it was distributed,and the things that he said were different things regarding praying and more stuff,in addition people usually take “errors” from quran without learning the deep deep arabic language were every word is explained,this leads to taking literal contexts instead of meaningful ones.
What Muhammad said wasn’t simply memorized by believers though. He would have someone write it down in that, he would do the memorizing then recall it for it to be written down. With this fact alone, most of what you say next falls to pieces.
More than that, I believe that you were referring to the Hadith rather than the Quran. These are NOT to be confused with the Quran. Unlike the Quran, the Hadith, were not given to prophet Muhammad by Allah s.w., they were teachings on various topics rather than a guidelines for Muslims to act upon. There was only one man trusted to write the Quran while with hadith, you had many different versions from many different people.
The death of Christ on the cross is predicted in the Old Testament, see Isaiah 53:1-12 [a passage not read in the weekly readings in synagogues], Zech. 12:10, Psalm 16:8-11, [includes the resurrection] Psalm 22:16, Daniel 9:26, etc. The Qur’an cannot allow for the cross for to do so would mean that Muslims will have to look beyond Islam for salvation; because only the cross can provide sinners with the forgiveness of sins. Therefore Islam has said that Christ never died on the cross.This is maddening. Tell me that Lincoln was not assassinated or that Caesar died of old age in a nursing home. But tell me that Christ was not crucified and I will surely be set to wondering. Also, this error goes back to the Gnostic Basiledes, who like the Muslims must have not had the need to be forgiven of his sins.
You believe that Jesus is God, no? So tell me, how does a God DIE by the hands of the men he created?