Is the Quran or Bible the Word of God? Christianity or Islam?

Does the Bible Contradict Itself?

Alleged Bible contradictions

Sometimes Muslims send me long lists of alleged Bible contradictions with headings like:


Muslims believe God Almighty never contradicts Himself.  They believe theirs lists of contradictions disprove the Bible arguing the Bible cannot be the Word of God.

Do not enter; Enter only

Does the Bible Blatantly Contradict Itself?

Often, Muslims are just cutting and pasting arguments from other websites.  Numerous times they have sent or use Ahmed Deedat’s arguments which can be found in his, “Is the Bible God’s Word.”  I’ve found that many Muslims have never actually taken the time to read or study the Bible for themselves.  The question I pose to my Muslim friends is, “Of all these alleged contradictions, which one have you studied and found most convincing?”  I don’t recall them ever giving me an answer – evidence that they haven’t studied the issue carefully.

One Bible contradiction sent to me is found in 1 Samuel 24 and 2 Chronicles 21 where one passages mentions three years of famine and the other mentions seven years of famine (2 Samuel 24:13; 1 Chronicles 21:11-12).  Which is it?

There are several ways this question can be answered.  Gleason Archer offers the following explanation,

Why is there a discrepancy in the number of years of famine mentioned in 2 Samuel 24:13 and in 1 Chronicles 21:11–12?

2 Samuel 24:13 relates the visit of the prophet Gad to King David after he had finished the census of his kingdom in a spirit of pride. Gad relays God’s message to him in the following terms: “Shall seven years of famine come to you in your land? Or will you flee three months before your foes while they pursue you? Or shall there be three days’ pestilence in your land?” (NASB). To this David replies in a spirit of humble repentance, “Let us now fall into the hand of the LORD, for His mercies are great, but do not let me fall into the hand of man” (v.14, NASB).

In 1 Chronicles 21:11–12, Gad comes to David and says to him, “Thus says the LORD, ‘Take for yourself either three years of famine, or three months to be swept away before your foes …, or else three days of the sword of the LORD, even pestilence in the land.’ ” (NASB). Note that the wording here is significantly different from that of 2 Samuel 24:13 (i.e., “Shall seven years of famine come to you?”). Rather than that simple question in 2 Samuel, we have it given here in 1 Chronicles as an alternative imperative (“Take for yourself either three years of famine …”).

From this we may reasonably conclude that 2 Samuel records the first approach of Gad to David, in which the alternative prospect was seven years; the Chronicles account gives us the second and final approach of Nathan to the king, in which the Lord (doubtless in response to David’s earnest entreaty in private prayer) reduced the severity of that grim alternative to three years rather than an entire span of seven. As it turned out, however, David finally opted for God’s own preference (whether famine or pestilence); and God sent three days of severe pestilence, which carried off the lives of seventy thousand men of Israel.

Gleason Archer, New International Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties.

Norman Geisler offers the following explanation of these passages in the Bible,

PROBLEM: God spoke to Gad and instructed him to offer David three alternative punishments for his sin. According to 2 Samuel 24:13, the famine was to be seven years. However, according to 1 Chronicles 21:12, the famine was to be three years. Which one of these is correct?

SOLUTION: There are two possible ways to reconcile these accounts. Some commentators propose that the prophet Gad actually confronted David on two occasions. This proposal is based on the difference in language used to present the alternatives to David. In the 2 Samuel passage, Gad presents the alternatives as a question, “Shall seven years of famine come to you in your land” (v. 13). In the 1 Chronicles passage the alternatives are presented more along the lines of a command, “Choose for yourself, either three years of famine, or three months to be defeated” (vv. 11–12). Those who offer this solution assume that perhaps the 2 Samuel passage records the first encounter of Gad and David in which the alternatives are presented for David’s consideration, and that after some fasting and prayer, Gad returned for David’s decision by which time God had reduced the duration of the famine from seven to three years in response to David’s supplication.

Another group of commentators suggests that the record in 2 Samuel is a copyist error. They point out that there are more reliable manuscripts which preserve the number “three” for the duration of the famine and that the niv has employed this manuscript reading in its translation.

Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe, Big Book of Bible Difficulties, The: Clear and Concise Answers from Genesis to Revelation

Is the Bible the Word of God or Is the Quran the Word of God?

The Bible is the Word of God and while there are difficulties, there are not any errors or contradictions.   I therefore encourage you to study for yourself the Bible especially since the Quran contradicts history by denying Jesus’ death on the cross.  Explore further whether the Bible or the Quran is the Word of God by reading,

Christian and Muslim dialogue about the Quran, Christianity, Islam, and the Bible.



Related Posts

What resources have you found helpful for explaining Bible difficulties?  Are there any passages in the Bible you believe contradict one another for which there is no answer?

3 Responses to “Does the Bible Contradict Itself?”

  1. Jhonny says:

    Seriously Dude???? Do you actually take your bullshit seriously????

    And WHERE is it an historical FACT that Jesus died on the cross??? Just because you were brainwashed into this doesn’t make it an HISTORICAL FACT!!!

    You have absolutely no logical thinking! Typical of ALL bible-thumpers and Donald Trump – birds of a feather …………

    • agoerner says:

      Yes, I do take history seriously. If Jesus’ death on the cross is not an historical event (“fact”), then what is it? Why is belief in Jesus’ death on the cross illogical?

    • Valerie says:

      Cold Case Christianity.

      You should read it. Author was an athiestic homicide detective who set out to disprove the Bible and he took a secular approach. By the way any secular historian would say Jesus was crucified. Do your research before calling us proud Bible thumpers brainwashed :)

What is your opinion?

Tags: ,

This entry was filed under Ahmed Deedat, Bible, Dialogue. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Oh dear! It looks like you're viewing this website in Internet Explorer 6.

IE6 has problems displaying many websites correctly and is no longer supported by Microsoft. If you want to see this website with the beautiful design intended, you should upgrade to IE8 or maybe have a fresh start with Firefox or Safari. To make this website usable in IE6, you are being presented with a 'bare-bones' layout.